<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Demo Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://demo.w3lift.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://demo.w3lift.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 09:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Survival of the Small Webmaster in a World of Link Building</title>
		<link>http://demo.w3lift.com/2008/02/19/survival-of-the-small-webmaster-in-a-world-of-link-building/</link>
		<comments>http://demo.w3lift.com/2008/02/19/survival-of-the-small-webmaster-in-a-world-of-link-building/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://me.mywebsight.ws/2008/02/19/survival-of-the-small-webmaster-in-a-world-of-link-building/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Survival of the Small Webmaster in a World of Link Building - Basically, all the rules and algorithms Google use to determine natural relevancy backfire if you don&#8217;t do things exactly the way the big G expects.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/016291.html">Survival of the Small Webmaster in a World of Link Building</a> - Basically, all the rules and algorithms Google use to determine natural relevancy backfire if you don&#8217;t do things exactly the way the big G expects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://demo.w3lift.com/2008/02/19/survival-of-the-small-webmaster-in-a-world-of-link-building/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PAGERANK IS THE PRIMARY GOOGLE SEARCH RANKING FACTOR</title>
		<link>http://demo.w3lift.com/2008/02/05/pagerank-is-the-primary-google-search-ranking-factor/</link>
		<comments>http://demo.w3lift.com/2008/02/05/pagerank-is-the-primary-google-search-ranking-factor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Reading]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PageRank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://me.mywebsight.ws/2008/02/05/pagerank-is-the-primary-google-search-ranking-factor/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PageRank is the primary Google search ranking factor - Too bad, I lost 3 PR&#8217;s from 6 to 3 in the last 3 months. Damn TLA
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://andybeard.eu/2008/02/pagerank-google-search-ranking-factor.html">PageRank is the primary Google search ranking factor</a> - Too bad, I lost 3 PR&#8217;s from 6 to 3 in the last 3 months. Damn TLA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://demo.w3lift.com/2008/02/05/pagerank-is-the-primary-google-search-ranking-factor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why are you still using Internet Explorer?</title>
		<link>http://demo.w3lift.com/2008/02/05/why-are-you-still-using-internet-explorer/</link>
		<comments>http://demo.w3lift.com/2008/02/05/why-are-you-still-using-internet-explorer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 14:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[internet explorer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[web standatrds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://me.mywebsight.ws/2008/02/05/why-are-you-still-using-internet-explorer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Yes, You!
Yesterday I noticed that 41.7% of you are still using Internet Explorer. And this is a blog written by a Mac fanatic, and which most probably cannot be understood by the common non techie english speaker. So you don&#8217;t have excuses like &#8220;that&#8217;s what my computer came with and installing software is too overwhelming [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://demo.w3lift.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/killie.jpg' alt='killie.jpg' /></p>
<p>Yes, <b>You!</b></p>
<p>Yesterday I noticed that 41.7% of you are still using Internet Explorer. And this is a blog written by a Mac fanatic, and which most probably cannot be understood by the common non techie english speaker. So you don&#8217;t have excuses like &#8220;that&#8217;s what my computer came with and installing software is too overwhelming for me&#8221;.</p>
<p>If you are using Internet Explorer, and you actually gave a thought to what browser you are using, you will probably argue in favor of features, comfort, or stability. You are missing the point, Completely.</p>
<p>The main technologies that run the web, (X)HTML and CSS, are not utilized to their full potential due to a lack of support from the most popular web browser, Internet Explorer. By using Internet explorer, you are helping in perpetuating the web, and making advancement more difficult.</p>
<p>Not to mention from my perspective (and any web developers perspective) the need to find hack to make sites look normal in a non standards compliant browser ads another %50 work time and expense, which can be used for better things.</p>
<p>If you want to know more about why IE is bad for you, check out <a href="http://killie.mywebsight.ws">Kill IE</a></p>
<p>To end this with good news, I just wand to link to this article that states that in Europe, <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080129-firefox-gobbles-up-more-internet-explorer-market-share.html">Firefox has a 28% market share</a>. Soon enough the world will catch up. Let&#8217;s hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://demo.w3lift.com/2008/02/05/why-are-you-still-using-internet-explorer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tapping into Unconventional Link Attributes</title>
		<link>http://demo.w3lift.com/2008/02/04/tapping-into-unconventional-link-attributes/</link>
		<comments>http://demo.w3lift.com/2008/02/04/tapping-into-unconventional-link-attributes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 13:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://me.mywebsight.ws/2008/02/04/tapping-into-unconventional-link-attributes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tapping into Unconventional Link Attributes - &#8220;Fresh&#8221; links can boost your rankings
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.seo-scientist.com/unconventional-link-attributes.html">Tapping into Unconventional Link Attributes</a> - &#8220;Fresh&#8221; links can boost your rankings</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://demo.w3lift.com/2008/02/04/tapping-into-unconventional-link-attributes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Herd Organic Search Traffic to Your Blog</title>
		<link>http://demo.w3lift.com/2008/02/03/how-to-herd-organic-search-traffic-to-your-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://demo.w3lift.com/2008/02/03/how-to-herd-organic-search-traffic-to-your-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 15:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://me.mywebsight.ws/2008/02/03/how-to-herd-organic-search-traffic-to-your-blog/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How to Herd Organic Search Traffic to Your Blog - It&#8217;s not as simple as it sounds, but it works (I hope)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2008/02/04/how-to-herd-organic-search-traffic-to-your-blog/">How to Herd Organic Search Traffic to Your Blog</a> - It&#8217;s not as simple as it sounds, but it works (I hope)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://demo.w3lift.com/2008/02/03/how-to-herd-organic-search-traffic-to-your-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SuperCook.com and the pace of web 2.0.1b</title>
		<link>http://demo.w3lift.com/2008/02/03/supercookcom-and-the-pace-of-web-201b/</link>
		<comments>http://demo.w3lift.com/2008/02/03/supercookcom-and-the-pace-of-web-201b/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 06:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[recipe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://me.mywebsight.ws/2008/02/03/supercookcom-and-the-pace-of-web-201b/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Only 5 days ago, I purchased ResourcefulCooking.com. The plan was as follows: Create a search engine, that indexes the top recipe sites, and is searchable by ingredient. As a chef-wannabe, but also an empty fridge cook, the idea was natural. What better way to find out what to do with 2 onions, a carrot and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://demo.w3lift.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/picture-1.png' title='picture-1.png'><img src='http://demo.w3lift.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/picture-1-150x150.png' alt='picture-1.png'  style="float: left; margin-right: 5px;" /></a>Only 5 days ago, I purchased <a href="http://www.resourcefulcooking.com">ResourcefulCooking.com</a>. The plan was as follows: Create a search engine, that indexes the top recipe sites, and is searchable by ingredient. As a chef-wannabe, but also an empty fridge cook, the idea was natural. What better way to find out what to do with 2 onions, a carrot and a pack of ground beef.</p>
<p>Then a day later, my RSS notifier beeped. One of the new articles was about a new recipe search engine, with features exactly like I described above, and implementation beyond perfect. it&#8217;s called <a href="http://www.supercook.com/">SuperCook&#8221;</a></p>
<p>Yes, I can always be no. 2, or if I work hard enough, beat them and become #1.  But I&#8217;m not going to waste my time on something that was already done, especially when it was done so nicely. Kudos!</p>
<p>Now here comes the scary part. What if SuperCook would be launched only after I spent hundreds of hours, or worse, thousands of dollars in my new project? As far as I know, there&#8217;s no answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://demo.w3lift.com/2008/02/03/supercookcom-and-the-pace-of-web-201b/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brandable domains vs. keyword-rich domains</title>
		<link>http://demo.w3lift.com/2008/02/03/brandable-domains-vs-keyword-rich-domains/</link>
		<comments>http://demo.w3lift.com/2008/02/03/brandable-domains-vs-keyword-rich-domains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 06:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[brand]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[domain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[keyword]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://me.mywebsight.ws/2008/02/03/brandable-domains-vs-keyword-rich-domains/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ProBlogger posted a question:
When choosing domain names do you get a keyword rich or more brandable name? 
Basically, the days you can have a domain which is both nice and also actually has the a keyword or two in it are long gone.
But look at the real world: most brands, branded for people, do not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2008/02/02/how-to-choose-a-domain-name-brandable-domains-vs-keyword-rich-domains/">ProBlogger posted</a> a question:</p>
<blockquote><p>When choosing domain names do you get a keyword rich or more brandable name? </p></blockquote>
<p>Basically, the days you can have a domain which is both nice and also actually has the a keyword or two in it are long gone.</p>
<p>But look at the real world: most brands, branded for people, do not contain any &#8216;keyword&#8217; reference. Nissan doesn&#8217;t have the word &#8216;Car&#8217; in it (although General Motors has &#8216;motor&#8217;) Ikea doesn&#8217;t have &#8216;furniture&#8217; and even Coca-Cola doesn&#8217;t have &#8217;sugary brown soft drink&#8217; in it.</p>
<p>On the other hand, in the web media, search engines give a strong weight to domain names containing keywords, so allot of sites want keyword-rich domains.</p>
<p><b>Look at your target traffic:</b><br />
If you&#8217;re building another generic site, and you plan on basing most of your traffic on one-time incoming links from search engines, then yes, get yourself a keyword rich domain. But if you plan on actually building a site that will become a brand, and people will come back and recommend your site to friends, then a more brnadable domain is better.</p>
<p>Of course, if you&#8217;re not going to be the next web 2.1 thing, keep the name fairly simple, because you need to be really good for people to struggle with a crazy domain such as <a href="http://del.icio.us/">del.icio.us</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://demo.w3lift.com/2008/02/03/brandable-domains-vs-keyword-rich-domains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon Patents Customized 404 Pages</title>
		<link>http://demo.w3lift.com/2008/01/31/amazon-patents-customized-404-pages/</link>
		<comments>http://demo.w3lift.com/2008/01/31/amazon-patents-customized-404-pages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Reading]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[software patent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://me.mywebsight.ws/2008/01/31/amazon-patents-customized-404-pages/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amazon Patents Customized 404 Pages. I&#8217;m going to patent scratching your nose with the back of a pencil. Really, software patents are evil.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/08/01/30/1321241.shtml">Amazon Patents Customized 404 Pages</a>. I&#8217;m going to patent scratching your nose with the back of a pencil. Really, <a href="http://tonymarston.net/php-mysql/software-patents-are-evil.html">software patents</a> <a href="http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/en/m/intro/index.html">are evil</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://demo.w3lift.com/2008/01/31/amazon-patents-customized-404-pages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wrap up your work and pick up the next day from the same spot</title>
		<link>http://demo.w3lift.com/2008/01/31/wrap-up-your-work-and-pick-up-the-next-day-from-the-same-spot/</link>
		<comments>http://demo.w3lift.com/2008/01/31/wrap-up-your-work-and-pick-up-the-next-day-from-the-same-spot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://me.mywebsight.ws/2008/01/31/wrap-up-your-work-and-pick-up-the-next-day-from-the-same-spot/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever been working on a project, and you have a bunch of tabs open, and you want to finish work for the day, and lets say, read the news or watch a movie?
So, you can always open a new browser window, and even minimize the work one, but you are always at risk of accidently [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever been working on a project, and you have a bunch of tabs open, and you want to finish work for the day, and lets say, read the news or watch a movie?<br />
So, you can always open a new browser window, and even minimize the work one, but you are always at risk of accidently closing the wrong window, and loosing all your locations.<br />
But here&#8217;s a fool-proof way of doing it, without worrying about you or someone else closing your browser window.<br />
1. In Safari, have all your important locations opened in tabs in the same window.<br />
2. In the bookmark menu, select &#8220;Add bookmark for these XX tabs&#8221;<br />
3. Select a name and save your bookmark in the tabs bar.<br />
4. Next day, just click on the bookmark and all your tabs will open the way they were.<br />
5. Now you an just drag the bookmark off the bookmarks bar to delete it.<br />
<a href='http://demo.w3lift.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/picture-1.png' title='picture-1.png'><img src='http://demo.w3lift.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/picture-1-150x108.png' alt='picture-1.png' /></a><a href='http://demo.w3lift.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/picture-2.png' title='picture-2.png'><img src='http://demo.w3lift.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/picture-2-150x150.png' alt='picture-2.png' /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://demo.w3lift.com/2008/01/31/wrap-up-your-work-and-pick-up-the-next-day-from-the-same-spot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Write Better Posts, Every Time</title>
		<link>http://demo.w3lift.com/2008/01/30/how-to-write-better-posts-every-time/</link>
		<comments>http://demo.w3lift.com/2008/01/30/how-to-write-better-posts-every-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://me.mywebsight.ws/2008/01/30/how-to-write-better-posts-every-time/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How to Write Better Posts, Every Time - how to make good content great.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2008/01/31/how-to-write-better-posts-every-time/">How to Write Better Posts, Every Time</a> - how to make good content great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://demo.w3lift.com/2008/01/30/how-to-write-better-posts-every-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
